youindangergurl2:

mens-rights-activia:

How to write an early 2000’s garage band song

😂😂

(via spongebobssquarepants)

jerry-mogwaire:

heauxsettastoned:

Gay culture is having Schrödinger’s unconditional love from your parents before coming out.

That’s the best description i’ve seen of it

(via ready-player-fun)

blogthegreatrouge:

jumpingjacktrash:

commandtower-solring-go:

juneboba:

twiststreet:

!!!

image

This is incredible because it is super difficult to visualise how much 6 feet actually is and most people don’t bother to try

HOLY SHIT ok first of all that is a brilliant use of technology, and second, that activated my flight response bigtime and i bet it convinced people to evacuate that weren’t gonna, which would’ve saved lives. so good job folks, worth the effort.

Why can’t she share that protective shield spell that she clearly casted on herself at least?

(via felsicgay-deactivated20200528)

i’m gay and my glasses are dirty

gay-white-bread:

reblog if you’re gay and your glasses are dirty

(via felsicgay-deactivated20200528)

glumshoe:

lillivati:

cryptognomicon:

glumshoe:

glumshoe:

glumshoe:

glumshoe:

glumshoe:

glumshoe:

glumshoe:

glumshoe:

glumshoe:

glumshoe:

glumshoe:

glumshoe:

glumshoe:

“Should I lick the science?” forensic science edition: look, if you have to ask, you’re in the wrong line of work.

“Should I lick the science?” sociology edition: the IRB really won’t like that even if your subject thinks it’s kind of hot

“Should I lick the science?” vulcanology edition: part of me really wants to see you try

“Should I lick the science?” gynecology edition: ……….I mean. Definitely not in a professional context, but recreationally…? I’m sure it’ll be appreciated.

“Should I lick the science?” epidemiology edition: that is how you become the science

“Should I lick the science?” astrology edition: what science?

“Should I lick the science?” criminology edition: what, like there aren’t enough problems with the criminal justice system already? come on.

“Should I lick the science?” hematology edition: if this is your only way to acquire sustenance without violence, then I suppose I can’t judge. go ahead, but be mindful of mirrors. 

“Should I lick the science?” entomology edition:  I personally can’t recommend it enough. but use discretion (and avoid any pointy bits). 

“Should I lick the science?” robotics edition: if it’s like… a roomba, that’s probably fine, but at some point it’s going to get kind of fucked up, and who among us is truly qualified to draw that ethical line in the sand? 

“Should I lick the science?” proctology edition: I mean… you do you, but for fuck’s sake use protection unless you’re trying to keep bacteriologists and parasitologists in business

“Should I lick the science?” cosmology edition: Oh, absolutely. I’m currently trying to answer the question “how many licks does it take to get to the center of the universe?” and my tongue is getting really tired. I can use all the help I can get.

“Should I lick the science?” geology edition: NO!!! But you can and you should lick any geologist who claims otherwise. You can tell them apart from other scientists by taste and porosity.

*“Should I lick the science?” legal edition:* You taint my evidence, I’m going to get your ass disabbarred. … Christ, who would even think to do that?!”

It bothers me that the geology one is wrong. Tasting/chewing certain types of specimens is a legitimate identification technique actually taught to students.

You some kind of geologist-apologist, huh?